mirror of
https://github.com/preservim/vim-pencil.git
synced 2025-11-13 12:23:47 -05:00
rewrite of feature list
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,10 +4,11 @@
|
||||
|
||||
Features of this plugin:
|
||||
|
||||
* Configures Vim for word processing, with key mappings, undo points, etc.
|
||||
* Agnostic on hard line endings _versus_ soft wrapping
|
||||
* Sets up buffer for word processing
|
||||
* Use for editing markdown, textile, documentation, etc.
|
||||
* Can detect wrapping approach via modeline
|
||||
* Configures wrap mode, auto-detecting from modeline if present
|
||||
* Adjusts navigation key mappings to suit the wrap mode
|
||||
* Creates undo points on common punctuation
|
||||
|
||||
Why such a minimalistic approach? There are several Vim plugins for
|
||||
writing that take a comprehensive approach, including changing not only
|
||||
@@ -56,14 +57,12 @@ plugin.)
|
||||
|
||||
## Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
### Hard breaks or soft wrapping?
|
||||
### Hard line breaks or soft line wrapping?
|
||||
|
||||
Where do you stand on hard line breaks versus soft line wrapping?
|
||||
|
||||
Typically, coders will have the most experience with the former, and
|
||||
writers the latter. But whatever your background, chances are that you
|
||||
will be living in a mixed environment where you must contend with both.
|
||||
This plugin doesn't force you to choose a side—each buffer is configured
|
||||
Coders will have the most experience with the former, and writers the
|
||||
latter. But whatever your background, chances are that you will be living
|
||||
in a mixed environment where you must contend with both. This plugin
|
||||
doesn't force you to choose a side—each buffer is configured
|
||||
independently.
|
||||
|
||||
In most cases you can set a default to suit your preference and let
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user